You don’t have any Active Subscription.

Subscribed with another email? Logout and Login with that one.

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

Additional Subscription Benefits

Need help with your subscription?

The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.

First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.

Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.

Science For All The weekly newsletter from science writers takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in!

Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers

THEdge At the cutting edge of education and careers

Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there

Gender Agenda Stories from beyond the binary.

On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.

Published - August 24, 2026 12:02 am IST - Bengaluru

A.N. Yellappa Reddy | Photo Credit: K. MURALI KUMAR

Former Karnataka Forests, Ecology and Environment Secretary A.N. Yellappa Reddy has urged Chief Secretary to reconsider the proposed amendment to the Karnataka Government Parks (Preservation) Act, 1975, warning that allowing even 5% of protected park land for infrastructure could set a wider precedent.

In a letter on August 23, Mr. Reddy said that the proposed 5% provision required detailed scrutiny and questioned whether it was backed by scientific studies or recommendations from ecologists, horticulturists, planners or other independent experts.

He said that Lalbagh’s ecological character could not be assessed merely through acreage or percentages, citing its old trees, soil, water systems, biodiversity and horticultural heritage.

Mr. Reddy recalled that a proposal to construct Veera Soudha inside Lalbagh had earlier been reconsidered and located elsewhere, arguing that development should not come at the cost of established public parks. He asked the Chief Secretary to examine the complete record, including the DPR, alternative alignments, tree and biodiversity studies, environmental assessments and reasons for rejecting alternatives.

He also warned that accepting a 5% diversion could eventually lead to larger portions being considered for other projects.

Mr. Reddy urged the government to drop the proposal and said that he would seek legal accountability, if necessary, should the amendment proceed.

Published - August 24, 2026 12:02 am IST

Terms & conditions  |  Institutional Subscriber

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.