You don’t have any Active Subscription.
Subscribed with another email? Logout and Login with that one.
Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription
Additional Subscription Benefits
Need help with your subscription?
The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.
First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.
Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.
Science For All The weekly newsletter from science writers takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in!
Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers
THEdge At the cutting edge of education and careers
Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there
Gender Agenda Stories from beyond the binary.
On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.
Published - August 23, 2026 10:25 am IST - Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that government authorities cannot force private landowners to execute sale deeds for the acquisition of land. File | Photo Credit: iStockphoto/Getty Images
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that government authorities cannot force private landowners to execute sale deeds for the acquisition of land.
The Lucknow Bench of the court said on Friday (August 21, 2026) that land can be purchased through a sale deed only when the owner voluntarily agrees to sell and both sides mutually agree on the sale price; if no such consent is forthcoming, the State government will have to follow the statutory land acquisition procedure.
With this, the court directed the authorities not to harass the petitioners or forcibly obtain their consent for executing sale deeds. It also made it clear that voluntary sale and compulsory acquisition are two distinct legal processes.
A Bench of Justice Shekhar B Saraf and Justice Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary passed the order on a petition filed by Akhilesh Kumar Pankaj and seven others concerning acquisition of their land in Devipatan Tulsipur village of Balrampur district for road widening.
The State government told the court that the land was being purchased for widening the road. Nearly 80% of the required land had already been purchased through sale deeds, with around 104 registrations executed by different landowners. However, the authorities had not been able to contact the petitioners or obtain their consent for the purchase of their land.
The petitioners, on the other hand, submitted that they were not willing to sell their land. They alleged that the authorities were pressuring them to sell their property at a rate which was unacceptable to them.
After considering the issue, the bench observed that the law on the issue was clear and hence, if the landowners were willing to sell and the State was able to negotiate and arrive at an agreement on the sale price, they could sell the property to the State. However, in the absence of such consent, the State would have to issue a notification under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and acquire the land in accordance with law, the Bench added.
The court directed the authorities not to harass the petitioners or forcibly obtain their consent for execution of sale deeds. It clarified that if any petitioner voluntarily wished to sell the property, a sale deed could be executed in accordance with law.
Published - August 23, 2026 10:25 am IST
Terms & conditions | Institutional Subscriber
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.
Comments ()
Be the first to share your perspective on this story!